Pajama Journal


Faded-Flannel, Fluffy-Sock Journalism

July 31st, 2011 at 8:51 pm

The Unacceptable Costs of Drug Testing Welfare Applicants

By Deborah Mackto

Florida has been hit hard by the deterioration of the nation’s economic condition. The recession and resulting unemployment has created the need for more families to apply for public assistance during a time when the State is facing significant budget deficits. On May 31st of this year Governor Richard Scott signed legislation into law that requires all applicants for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program to submit to, pay a fee for and pass a drug test by urine sample. Governor Scott said, “It’s the right thing for citizens of this state that need public assistance. We don’t want to waste tax dollars. And also, we want to give people an incentive to not use drugs” (Florida Governor Signs Welfare Drug-screen Measure). However, testing welfare applicants violates the United States Constitution, causes catastrophic emotional and financial hardship on our neediest citizens, fails to address Florida’s most dire drug dependency problem and wastes tax dollars at a time that we can least afford it. The potential benefits of this legislation are dwarfed by the costs and negative consequences.

The negative consequences will be catastrophic to families who are the victims of false positive tests. The cost of potential false positive tests cannot be ignored.  An example is found in the case of Elizabeth Mort. Elizabeth is not a drug user but because she ate an “Everything Bagel” containing poppy seeds two hours before she went into labor, her baby was taken from her only one day after her birth. The hysterical and confused parents were given no information on where their baby was taken and for five agonizing days did not know what had gone wrong or what to do about it. Nothing will repair the emotional scars caused by a flawed policy and a false positive drug test (Sullum). Under the new law the neediest of Florida’s citizens, those least able to defend themselves, will face the same kind of nightmare simply because they need financial assistance. Catastrophic emotional consequences due to false positive drug tests are not an acceptable risk to a civil society.

A civil society cannot assume that its least fortunate people, those who are in need of financial aid, are wasting aid dollars on drugs. A study by the University of Florida indicates that welfare recipients are no more likely to be drug abusers than the general population (Crew, Davis). The same study tells us that 97 percent of those tested will pass a drug screening.  Opiates and other dangerous drugs leave the body quickly, some in as little as one day (Drugs of Abuse Reference Guide).  A determined drug abuser would only need to abstain from drug use for a few days to pass drug testing.

Just as the most determined drug abuser will not be hampered by drug testing, the most dangerous and pervasive drug of this decade is not addressed by the legislation because this drug is a product of the pill-mills prescribing Oxycontin (Collins). Drug abusers of Oxycontin have prescriptions from these pill mills and will pass drug screenings.  For these reasons the most serious and dangerous drugs are missed or excluded by drug testing while the innocent ingestion of a poppy seed muffin will cause families to be entangled in the underfunded Department of Children and Families with devastating consequences. In the small number of cases where an applicant with a serious drug problem tests positive for an illegal drug, the law only requires they be given a pamphlet with treatment information. According to the official legislative summary of the law it does not provide for treatment, counseling or resources of any kind to rehabilitate the offender (”Florida House of Representatives - Documents”).

In addition to being ineffective against real drug users and ignoring the legality of our most common drug abuse, the law is unconstitutional. The legislative summary declares that, “The bill raises important constitutional questions related to the permissibility of suspicionless drug testing as a condition of public assistance.”  Indeed there have been numerous court rulings declaring similar suspicionless drug testing unconstitutional and a violation of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America (Drug Testing of Public Assistance Recipients as a Condition of Eligibility). The Fourth Amendment protects us against search and seizure without probable cause. The collection of urine and other bodily fluids by government agencies is considered search and seizure and is prohibited unless there is reasonable suspicion, a warrant, or when a concern for public safety is present. The state of Michigan attempted random testing of welfare recipients citing the special condition of public safety and was challenged in court by the ACLU. The Court ruled that there was not a public safety issue that would exempt Michigan from the prohibition against warrantless search and seizure. Michigan’s law was struck the law down as unconstitutional and since that ruling no other state has attempted drug testing of welfare recipients without cause. (Marchwinski v. Howard quot. in ACLU).

Unlike Michigan, Florida is not attempting to make a case for a public safety condition and rather than random testing has ordered blanket testing of all applicants. This is a blatant violation of the intent of the Fourth Amendment which the ACLU has pledged to challenge. It is widely believed that the courts will again rule against suspicionless search and seizure. It will be a disastrous erosion of our constitutional rights if the law is not struck down. If such an unlikely event were to occur it is certain that anyone receiving public assistance of any kind will eventually be subject to random or blanket drug testing including but not limited to unemployment benefits, subsidized housing, Medicaid, Medicare, disability, health care vouchers, student loans and Pell grants. If the sacrifice of constitutional rights is allowed because politicians, however well-intentioned find it convenient to do so, we stand to lose the foundation upon which our country was founded and the freedom we too often take for granted in America.

A dollar value cannot be place on freedom. Governor Scott’s remarks after signing the bill tell us that his motivation is to save tax dollars. He was elected based on promises to cut costs. Given the mood of the electorate and the legislature that sent the bill to him can be assumed to have similar motivation. Indeed it is a fact that tax-payers want to save money and that the State must reduce waste. With the current budget crunch many people are frustrated with government waste. Nobody wants to see tax money spent on illegal drugs when it could be used to hire teachers, improve infrastructure or reduce debt. It is easy to see why someone who hears about the law initially may believe it is a good idea, but when the facts and figures are analyzed it becomes clear that rather than saving tax-payer money, this law will have a high net cost to Florida tax-payers.

It may seem that having welfare applicants pay a fee for their own drug test would prevent the program from costing the state money however most aid applicants will pass the drug tests and under the law the state will reimburse them the fee. The cost of testing alone is conservatively estimated at between $560,000 to $1,400,000 with some estimates as high as $44,000,000 per year (Miller, Hendrie). The financial cost of administration of the testing program is not addressed in the legislation nor have resources been allocated for it.  The Department of Children and Families has been charged with the responsibility of implementing and administering tests as well as investigating when an applicant tests positive. DCF will have to decide who can be designated as a payee for the dependents of the applicant until the applicant is able to pass the test. This means a social worker must be assigned to interview family members. The Department of Children and Families has the primary responsibility of making sure children are not in danger so in the case of positive test results investigations must be done to ensure children are not in a dangerous environment. That will cost additional money and mistakes will be made. There are in fact, no financial savings at all associated with this law. Even when a welfare applicant tests positive the Department of Children and Families will investigate and designate an alternate payee for the dependents and benefits will still be paid (Florida House of Representatives – Documents). The law requiring the testing of welfare applicants has only net costs and those costs are too high.

            The costs of our constitutional rights, the cost of the devastating emotional consequences of false positives and the financial cost to implement, administer and defend it are unacceptable. Government cannot, according to the United States Constitution, subject our poorest citizens to unreasonable search and seizure based solely on financial need. The state of Florida cannot afford the waste of tax dollars on flawed legislation that will hurt its citizens and create a bureaucratic administrative disaster. We cannot afford the cost of our humanity. We cannot denigrate the rights of our neediest people. As Gandhi, Pope John Paul II, Cardinal Roger Mahoney and other great leaders have expressed, a humane society has an obligation to its least fortunate, an obligation we must all heed as we may one day find ourselves among them.

Works Cited

 

Barnett, Ron. “States Seek to Link Public Assistance, Drug Testing - USATODAY.com.” News, Travel, Weather, Entertainment, Sports, Technology, U.S. & World - USATODAY.com. USA TODAY, 19 Apr. 2011. Web. 11 July 2011.

Collins, Thomas R. “South Florida and Oxycodone: Invasion of the Pill Mills - TIME.” TIME U.S. TIME Magazine, 13 Apr. 2010. Web. 30 July 2011.

Crew, Robert, and Belinda Creel Davis. “Substance Abuse as a Barrier to Employment of Welfare Recipients.” Journal of Policy Practice 5.4 (2006): 69-82. Print.

“Drug Testing of Public Assistance Recipients as a Condition of Eligibility.” American Civil Liberties Union. ACLU, 8 Apr. 2008. Web. 10 July 2011.

“Drugs of Abuse Reference Guide.” LabCorp. Occupational Testing Services, 2007. Web. 30 July 2011.

“Florida Governor Signs Welfare Drug-screen Measure.” Cnn.com. CNN, 1 June 2011. Web. 11 July 2011.

“Florida House of Representatives - Documents.” Florida House of Representatives - MyFloridaHouse.gov. 11 May 2011. Web. 10 July 2011.

Miller, T. and Hendrie, D. Substance Abuse Prevention Dollars and Cents: A Cost-Benefit Analysis, DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 07-4298. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2008. Web. July 10, 2011

Sullum, Jacob. “Poppy seed peril: eat a bagel, lose your baby.” Reason Mar. 2011: 11. General Reference Center Gold. Web. 8 July 2011.

“Urine Drug Screen: MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia.” National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health. 22 June 2011. Web. 11 July 2011.

Stumble or Digg this post. These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
This entry was posted on Sunday, July 31st, 2011 at 8:51 pm and is filed under Constitutional Law. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

14 Responses to “The Unacceptable Costs of Drug Testing Welfare Applicants”

  1. Mercy Says:

    I want to say thank you a lot for the work you have made in writing this posting. I am hoping the same effective work from you in the future also.

  2. Knicks new jerseys 2014 Says:

    Where to buy wholesale cheap Kings jerseys china usa online

  3. Oliva Says:

    My brother recommended I might like this website.
    He was entirely right. This post actually made my day.
    You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this information!
    Thanks!

    my web site homepage (Oliva)

  4. Http://Www.1Menshealth.Com/Absolute-Detox-For-Drug-Test/ Says:

    I think this is one of the most vital information for me.
    And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The web site
    style is ideal, the articles is really great :
    D. Good job, cheers

  5. bigg boss 8 Premier Says:

    Searching and searching the internet all afternoon for something like this.
    Just want to say Thanks!

    my webpage bigg boss 8 Premier

  6. Melaka Property Says:

    Have you ever thought about publishing an ebook or guest authoring on other blogs?
    I have a blog centered on the same ideas you discuss and would really
    like to have you share some stories/information. I know my audience would value your work.
    If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me
    an e-mail.

    my weblog Melaka Property

  7. Meredith Says:

    You must spent a lot of time writing content on your site, you can save a lot of
    work, just type in gogle:
    treoughan’s rewriter

  8. ocenpodrecznik.pl Says:

    Spot on with this write-up, I absolutely feel this amazing site needs
    far more attention. I’ll probably be back again to read more, thanks for the advice!

  9. drugs and alcohol Says:

    Excellent blog right here! Additionally your web site quite a bit up very fast!

    What host are you using? Can I am getting your associate hyperlink on your host?
    I wish my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  10. Mlb Playoffs Tv Schedule Uk Says:

    Next time to get glasses feel very good, style and quality is still very good worth having to get glasses after, I feel very comfortable. 138 that is simply not comparable. Or genuine comparison reassuring.
    Mlb Playoffs Tv Schedule Uk http://datnendautu.com/PenknifeBright.aspx?6461746e656e64617574752e636f6d2c6a652c3831373132.htm

  11. ray ban rb3194 replacement parts Says:

    And goods sent too fast, packaging carefully, trustworthy! Baby received, very satisfied !! very good quality.
    ray ban rb3194 replacement parts http://bomtanviet.com/QuoteLaughter.aspx?626f6d74616e766965742e636f6d2c72622c3238303035.htm

  12. mlb away jerseys Will Suit You Says:

    I like cheap authentic jerseys china, and now mlb away jerseys Will Suit You

  13. cheap jerseys from china soccer Says:

    I am wholesale hockey jerseys supplier online, take coupon code here: cheap jerseys from china soccer

  14. 3 Matt Bryant Jersey Says:

    3 Matt Bryant Jersey.Shop for
    Wholesale Sports Jerseys with fast free shipping and great service baseball jerseys from
    china factory,cheap nike nfl jerseys online sale!

Leave a Reply